research report

Supercharged? Electricity Demand and the Electrification of Transportation in California

Abstract

The rapid electrification of the transportation fleet in California raises important questions about the reliability, cost, and environmental implications for the electric grid. A crucial first element to understanding these implications is an accurate picture of the extent and timing of residential electricity use devoted to electric vehicles. Although California is now home to over 650,000 electric vehicles (EVs), less than 5% of these vehicles are charged at home using a meter dedicated to EV use. This means that state policy has had to rely upon very incomplete data on residential charging use. This report summarizes the first phase of a project combining household electricity data and information on the adoption of electric vehicles over the span of four years. The research team proposes a series of approaches for measuring the effects of EV adoption on electricity load in California. First, the team measures load from the small subset of households that do have an EV-dedicated meter. Second, the paper estimates how consumption changes when households go from a standard residential electricity tariff to an EV-specific tariff. Finally, the research team suggests an approach for estimating the effect of EV ownership on electricity consumption in the average EV-owning household. The team implements this approach using aggregated data, but future work should use household-level data to more effectively distinguish signal from noise in this analysis. Preliminary results show that households on EV-dedicated meters are using 0.35 kWh per hour from Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE); 0.38 kWh per hour from Southern California Edison; and 0.28 kWh per hour from San Diego Gas and Electric on EV charging. Households switching to EV rates without dedicated meters are using less electricity for EV charging: 0.30 kWh per hour in PGE. The household approach applied to aggregated data is too noisy to be informative. These estimates should be viewed as evidence that a more focused analysis with more detailed data would be of high value and likely necessary to produce a rigorous analysis of the role EVs are playing in residential electricity consumption.

research report

Investigating the Influence of Dockless Electric Bike-share on Travel Behavior, Attitudes, Health, and Equity

Abstract

Cities throughout the world have implemented bike-share systems as a strategy for expanding mobility options. While these have attracted substantial ridership, little is known about their influence on travel behavior more broadly. The aim of this study was to examine how shared electric bikes (e-bikes) and e-scooters influence individual travel attitudes and behavior, and related outcomes of physical activity and transportation equity. The study involved a survey in the greater Sacramento area of 1959 households before (Spring 2016) and 988 after (Spring 2019) the Summer 2018 implementation of the e-bike and e-scooter service operated by Jump, Inc., as well as a direct survey of 703 e-bike users (in Fall 2018 & Spring 2019). Among household respondents, 3–13% reported having used the service. Of e-bike share trips, 35% substituted for car travel, 30% substituted for walking, and 5% were used to connect to transit. Before- and after-household surveys indicated a slight decrease in self-reported (not objectively measured) median vehicle miles traveled and slight positive shifts in attitudes towards bicycling. Service implementation was associated with minimal changes in health in terms of physical activity and number of collisions. The percentages of users by self-reported student status, race, and income suggest a fairly equitable service distribution by these parameters, but each survey under-represents racial minorities and people with low incomes. Therefore, the study is inconclusive about how this service impacts those most in need. Furthermore, aggregated socio-demographics of areas where trips started or ended did not correlate with and therefore are not reliable indicators of, the socio-demographics of e-bike-share users. Thus, targeted surveying of racial minorities and people with low incomes is needed to understand bike-share equity.

research report

Balancing Accountability and Flexibility in California’s Local Option Sales Taxes

Abstract

Voter-approved Local Option Transportation Sales Taxes (LOSTs) are a major source of revenue for transportation programs in California. LOSTs list projects and programs for voter approval that are to be implemented over long periods of time, often twenty or more years. To respond to changing conditions, agencies often need to amend voter-approved plans. Implementing agencies must be accountable to voters, balancing the need to fulfill commitments made against needs that change over time. Using the text of ballot measures, public utility codes, periodic agency reports, and case studies that included interviews of public officials, this study examines, provisions regarding accountability in California LOSTs, and procedures for amending proposed expenditures. It also reviews lawsuits brought in relation to accountability and plan amendments. It analyzes the ways in which California counties achieve needed flexibility within a framework that demands accountability to the voters. Requirements and patterns differ among counties, but most measures have been adapted to changing circumstances.

policy brief

Why is Bay Area Transit Ridership Falling?

policy brief

What Can Be Done About Falling Transit Ridership in the Bay Area?

policy brief

The Bay Area is Losing Transit Ridership — But Transit Commuting is Growing

policy brief

Why is Public Transit Falling in the San Francisco Bay Area, and What Might be Done About It?

Abstract

Public transit ridership has been slipping nationally and in California since 2014. The San Francisco Bay Area, with the highest share of transit trips in the state, had until recently resisted those trends, especially compared to Greater Los Angeles. However, in 2017 and 2018 the region lost over 27 million annual transit boardings, over 5 percent of all transit trips, despite a booming economy and service increases. The steepest ridership losses have come on buses, at off-peak times, on weekends, in non-commute directions, on outlying lines, and on operators that do not serve the region’s core employment clusters.Amidst falling Bay Area ridership, transit trips in the region are becoming much more commute-focused. Ridership at peak hours has grown dramatically, especially into and out of downtown San Francisco, resulting in severe overcrowding on Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). Researchers at the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies examined recent Bay Area ridership trends for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in order to identify both possible causes of falling transit use as well as potential policy responses. The key dimensions of shifting Bay Area transit use are summarized below.

research report

What’s Behind Recent Transit Ridership Trends in the Bay Area? Volume II: Trends among Major Transit Operators

Publication Date

February 1, 2020

Author(s)

Andrew Schouten, Brian D. Taylor, Evelyn Blumenberg, Hannah King, Jacob Wasserman, Julene Paul, Madeline Ruvolo, Mark Garrett

Abstract

Transit ridership in the San Francisco Bay Area is falling. Yet some operators, areas, times, directions, routes, modes, and services have fared better than others. These differences help reveal the causes of the Bay Area’s overall ridership slump and inform policy and service decisions that aim to restore Bay Area transit use. To investigate these temporal and spatial trends, the research team analyzes ridership on the eight largest Bay Area transit operators in considerable detail in Volume II of the report. Overall, the team finds a significant level of “peaking.” Ridership losses at off-peak hours, on weekends, on outlying routes, in non-commute directions, and on smaller operators account for a large and disproportionate share of the whole region’s patronage decline. Downtown San Francisco and commute-oriented rail lines like Caltrain have gained ridership as less central, lower-service routes have lost patronage. These patterns match the statistical modeling of BART ridership, on which station-area jobs had the greatest influence, one that has grown over time. The most significant exceptions to the Bay Area’s peaking problem are operators in urban cores, like Muni and AC Transit, where residential and employment density throughout the network have blunted peaking, though not necessarily overall losses. Absolute patronage declines and peaking are intertwined but distinct problems, with cross-cutting divisions. Yet in all agencies, it can be seen that at least some evidence of peaking. The resulting dependence on peak trips both incurs high costs and depresses passenger satisfaction.