published journal article

Spatial analysis and predictive modeling framework of truck parking and idling impacts on environmental justice communities

Abstract

This study introduces a comprehensive modeling framework to analyze truck idling and parking activities, illustrated through a case study in environmental justice communities in Kern County, California. It includes 1) exploratory spatial and cluster analysis to identify hotspots of those truck activities and their influencing factors, and 2) advanced predictive models, particularly the Cross-Validated Random Forests model, to predict and investigate critical factors influencing truck idling time, parking search time, and inferred truck parking demand. The results reveal that the percentage of heavy-duty trucks and the specific land use influence truck idling time. For parking search time, key predictors include distance to major roads and employment in certain industries. The inferred truck parking demand model underscores the impact of commercial land use areas, proximity to major roads, and socioeconomic factors. These findings enable the identification of hotspots for truck idling and parking searches, facilitating targeted interventions such as optimizing land use planning, improving infrastructure around major roads, and enhancing parking facilities in commercial zones. Integrating spatial, socioeconomic, and GPS aggregate data, the methodology provides a scalable framework applicable to other regions facing similar challenges through data-driven planning and policy initiatives.

Is Micromobility Being Used in Place of Car Trips?

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2022 - April 1, 2024

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Hossain Mohiuddin, Hossain Mohiuddin

Project Summary

Since 2017, there has been massive growth in micromobility trips (i.e., trips taken by electric bike-share and scooter-share). To understand the extent to which micromobility services such as bike-share and scooter-share are replacing driving, this project explores the trip-chaining patterns of micromobility users. The project uses travel diary data collected from micromobility users in 48 cities across the US. Results point to a considerable portion of car owners leaving their cars at home when using micromobility, suggesting that, for a subset of users, micromobility can form part of a car-free or car-light day of travel, despite having a car available.

Which Communities Suffer the Most from Neighborhood Severance Caused by Freeways?

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

September 20, 2021 - December 31, 2022

Principal Investigator

Project Summary

The racial legacy of freeways has come into stark focus in the past year. A recent Los Angeles Times article calls the region’s freeway system “one of the most noxious monuments to racism and segregation in the country.” A key feature of past freeways construction has been neighborhood severance. Freeways disrupt the neighborhood street grid, creating particular hardships for pedestrians who must take circuitous routes to access transit and to walk to stores, schools, and other destinations. The impacts of disconnected streets on walking and public health are well documented, but the environmental justice dimension of connectivity has remained unexplored, as has the link between street connectivity and local planning efforts. Reducing neighborhood severance is also a key goal in Caltrans’ 2017 bicycle and pedestrian plan, Towards an Active California. The plan commits the agency to identify and improve highway crossings and to prioritize improvements based on equity criteria. The research team will test whether Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) communities suffer greater neighborhood severance effects based on four measures of connectivity: local street connectivity, connectivity for transit access, the number of freeway crossings per mile, and the quality of those crossings (e.g., pedestrian comfort). The first two measures are based on street characteristics such as circuity and the proportion of streets that are dead-ends. The project team will also examine the strength of the relationship between these four connectivity measures and the race/ethnic composition of the neighborhoods, based on 2020 Census block-level demographic data, and on the age of the constructed freeways, to determine whether planners have become more attuned to severance effects over time. Finally, the researchers will consider where new or upgraded crossings would yield the greatest connectivity benefits, particularly in BIPOC communities, by simulating the addition of new crossings and the removal of existing crossings, to determine which improvements have the greatest potential to reconnect street networks and improve pedestrian and bicycle access to transit.

Looking Abroad to Understand the Potential Impacts of California High-Speed Rail on Economic Development, Land Use Patterns, and Future Growth of Cities

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

September 20, 2021 - September 30, 2023

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Giovanni Circella, Basar Ozbilen, Maria Carolina Lecompte, Andrew Jarnagin, Lucia Rossignol

Project Summary

New transportation networks facilitate mobility and may also spur economic development. This was the case with the construction of railway and highway networks in the U.S. during the late 19th and mid-20th century, respectively. Over the past decades, a new transportation technology—high-speed rail (HSR)—has had a profound impact on urban-regional accessibility and intercity travel across Europe and East and South-East Asia. A growing literature shows that HSR systems can also benefit local and regional economies. But the economic and spatial impacts of HSR have been varied and are largely contingent on a variety of factors, as well as local planning and policy. As California is in the process of building its own HSR network, it is important to review the experience of established HSR networks abroad to understand the possible economic effects that HSR can have on regional and local economies. While the impacts of California’s HSR plan on job creation in local markets (e.g., the construction sector) and on the travel sector (e.g., forecasts for HSR travel demand) have been investigated, the possible indirect impacts on land values, tourism, firm location, and local and regional development, among others, have not garnered enough attention. This study will provide guidance for the development of California HSR by undertaking a comprehensive literature review of the economic impacts of existing HSR systems and conducting case studies of HSR station-cities in Europe. The literature review will identify the prerequisites necessary for certain positive economic outcomes for different types of station-cities. The research team will examine the impacts of HSR on construction jobs, but also on post-construction job growth, firm relocation, residential and commercial development, tourism, and population growth. The team will select several individual case studies representing different city typologies with input from the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) and from the study’s advisory panel. The case studies will focus on station-cities that have experienced significant economic benefits since the initiation of HSR to identify how and why these benefits have occurred.

How Post-Pandemic Travel Trends May Affect Public Transit

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Julene Paul

Project Summary

California’s metropolitan areas have invested heavily in improving and expanding public transit systems over the past half century. But despite demonstrable improvements in transit provision, ridership was eroding in many areas during the dozen years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, and in most places and on most systems in California since 2016. But these dips in ridership paled in comparison to the crash in patronage that coincided with the onset of the pandemic. By the fall of 2020, most transit systems had recovered to about half of their pre-pandemic ridership, but transit’s recovery largely stalled there, even as rates of driving, walking, and biking have mostly recovered to pre-pandemic levels. Research has shown that the riders who left transit during the pandemic tended to be higher income, better educated, more likely white or Asian, and had access to private motor vehicles. Spatial patterns of ridership have shifted dramatically as well, with downtowns and other major job centers losing the most riders, and low-income neighborhoods retaining the most riders. In net, the level, timing, and direction of transit travel have changed dramatically. This study draws on previous research on transit usage changes during the pandemic, and supplements previous findings with additional travel data from transit operators and mobile device services to better understand how these new patterns of transit usage are evolving as the pandemic matures and recedes. In addition, this study draws on the findings from companion research on changing work and travel patterns to project likely patterns of transit use and demand in the months and years ahead to help public transit system managers and policy makers prepare for a post-pandemic transit future.

How Working from Home Could Change the Post-Pandemic Future of Travel

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Samuel Speroni

Campus(es)

UCLA

Project Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the number of persons working from home in California, which will likely have profound future implications for the environment, travel, public finance (e.g., public transit revenues, local tax base), transit operations, residential and commercial land use in addition to differential impacts based on individual workers by gender, parental status, and much more. Prior to the pandemic, only about five percent of the U.S. labor force worked primarily from home, despite four decades of predictions by transportation analysts that large-scale “telecommuting” was just around the corner. Yet between February and April of 2020, the share of the labor force working from home skyrocketed to well over 50 percent in response to public health orders designed to contain the pandemic. While no one expects the share of those working from home to remain that high as the pandemic recedes, there is considerable debate among experts on just how many workers will return full-time to employment sites, how many will split their working hours between home and a work site, and how many will remain working at home permanently. The answer to this question has enormous consequences for owners and developers of commercial and residential property, and transportation planners of all stripes. This research synthesizes literature on the relationship between working from home and travel. To examine this issue, the project team reviewed nearly 100 research articles, reports, and some popular accounts of telecommuting and travel prior to and during the pandemic. In conducting this review, the project team arrived at five principal findings. First, remote work increased dramatically with the onset of the pandemic and appears likely to remain elevated for many years to come. Second, while not everyone can work remotely, for those who have the option to do so, at least part-time, this hybrid option is extremely popular with most workers. Third, employers tend to be skeptical of the benefits of remote work, but the research does not support fears of declining productivity in the near term, and the tight post-pandemic labor market has given workers leverage to insist on remote work options. Fourth, telecommuting has long been touted as a potential solution to chronic transportation problems like traffic congestion and vehicle emissions, but the research has consistently found that it is more likely to increase, rather than decrease, overall driving among remote workers. This extra driving is due both to hybrid workers living farther from work, on average, than non-remote workers and to all remote workers making more household-serving and personal trips when they work from home. And fifth, public transit systems, in contrast to street and highway systems, have been dramatically affected by the pandemic, likely due substantially to the rise in remote work it has engendered. The future of many public transit systems, which draw an outsized share of their riders from commuters to downtowns and other major job centers, will depend on whether and to what extent those job centers re-densify with workers in the months and years ahead.

Pandemic-related Shifts in Work, Travel, and Transit Use: Implications for Public Policy

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

July 1, 2022 - October 31, 2023

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Project Summary

While the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected travel and transportation systems, driving has largely returned to pre-pandemic levels, even as a significantly larger share of the workforce works from home full- or part-time. However, there have been significant changes in the timing and patterns of car travel since before the pandemic. Moreover, public transit systems have been especially hard hit, and riders have proven slow to return. While transit use by those unable to drive (who are more likely poor, immigrants, people of color, and/or disabled) has substantially recovered since the shutdowns in the spring of 2020, daily commuting to and from major employment centers collapsed and is just beginning to recover. The shifts in motor vehicle travel and the more dramatic changes in public transit use are both likely related to workplace changes, as the number of remote and hybrid workers has increased. The longer-term effects of the pandemic on travel remain uncertain, as do the appropriate policy responses to changing traffic patterns broadly, and to depressed transit ridership specifically. Public transit is a key transportation pillar of California’s climate and equity goals, which will be harder to meet with driving up and transit riding down.

To examine late-pandemic shifts in trip timing, this project analyzed smartphone location data to track the location and timing of vehicle trips on streets and highways in Greater Los Angeles. Specifically, this study compares the average number of trip origins for each hour of the day in all 10,783 census block groups in Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties in October 2019 and October 2021. The project then estimated a series of statistical models to examine the factors associated with both the levels of and changes in the timing of afternoon peak-period trip-making. Following an initial analysis, this project focused on shifts in early (12 p.m.–3:59 p.m.) and late (4 p.m.–7:59 p.m.) afternoon trip-making between fall 2019 and fall 2021. The primary data comes from StreetLight, a location analytics company that provides travel datasets collected from mobile phones, GPS receivers, and other network-enabled devices. This data was augmented with information from the U.S. Census, Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Origin and Destination Employment Statistics (LODES), and the U.S. Department of Education.

Analyzing Telecommuting and Travel in California Before, During, and After the Pandemic

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

April 1, 2022 - June 30, 2024

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted day-to-day business and triggered massive changes in travel behavior for work and other activities. Due to social distance and travel restrictions imposed during the pandemic, teleworking has become much more prominent: a survey estimated that between February and May 2020, over one-third of the American labor force switched from in-person work to telework. The Census Pulse Survey (2020-2021) reported that 40% of households in California indicated that at least one household member substituted in-person work with telework (compared to the US national average of 37%). The pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine the potential impacts of teleworking on travel and measure the potential effectiveness of this work arrangement as a travel demand and environmental management tool.

This study examines changes in telecommuting and the resulting activity-travel behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a particular focus on California. A geographical approach was taken to “zoom in” to the county level and to major regions in California and to “zoom out” to comparable states (New York, Texas, Florida). Nearly one-third of the domestic workforce worked from home during the pandemic, a rate almost six times higher than the pre-pandemic level. At least one member from 35 percent of U.S. households replaced in-person work with telework; these individuals tended to belong to higher income, White, and Asian households. Workplace visits have continued to remain below pre-pandemic levels, but visits to non-work locations initially declined but gradually increased over the first nine months of the pandemic. During this period, the total number of trips in all distance categories except long-distance travel decreased considerably. Among the selected states, California experienced a higher reduction in both work and non-workplace visits and the State’s urban counties had higher reductions in workplace visits than rural counties. The findings of this study provide insights to improve understanding of the impact of telecommuting on travel behavior during the pandemic.

Telework Trends in California: Before, During, and Possibly After the Pandemic

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

April 1, 2022 - June 30, 2023

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

Forced by the COVID-19 pandemic and enabled by technology improvements, telework has received a big boost over the past 15 months. In addition to reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT), decreasing energy use, and lowering emissions of both air pollutants and of greenhouse gases, telecommuting has numerous potential co-benefits, including saving time (from commuting) and money (on gas and parking), increasing schedule flexibility, potentially improving work-life balance, and reducing stress (Gajendran and Harrison, 2007). To understand the extent to which telecommuting could increase because of the pandemic, this project will analyze a unique dataset on commuting and telework collected during a May-June 2021 random survey of Californians conducted by IPSOS. In addition, the research will quantify changes in VMT and in the resulting emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases. Quantifying recent changes in telecommuting is important to update sustainable community strategies and for understanding the likely contribution of telecommuting in meeting California’s GHG reduction targets.

Assessing Benefits from Shifting Passenger Travel from Air to High-Speed Rail in California

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

August 19, 2020 - August 18, 2021

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Kaijing Ding

Project Summary

This project proposes a Synthesis Study that will assess the economic benefits and impacts shifting air passenger traffic from air to rail. The assessment will take account of recent technological, economical, political, social, and epidemiological developments. It will incorporate the latest thinking on the importance of resilience and adaptability in assessing and planning infrastructure, and emerging recognition of the need to incorporate uncertainty into analyses of long-term benefit. Finally, it will inventory HSR deployment experiences from around the world to find the claimed and realized benefits from shifting air traffic to rail, as well as the role of complementary policies to the HSR deployment itself in promoting this shift.

According to the 2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan, California High-Speed Rail (HSR) is the highest transportation priority for the corridor between the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles. Many advocates view HSR as transformational and its benefits difficult to quantify, but consider reducing traffic demands on California’s roads and airports to be a major quantifiable benefit. The approaches to monetizing this benefit, while reasonable, is quite simplistic. The research team seeks a more comprehensive analysis that captures a wider set of benefit mechanisms and places confidence bounds on the benefits from each mechanism.