policy brief

Free Transit Helps Students—But Car Access, Transit Quality, and Perceptions Still Shape Who Benefits

Abstract

Fare-free transit programs are increasingly used to increase ridership and reduce household transportation costs, especially for lower-income households. In California, where fewer than ten percent of school trips are made on school buses and many students travel long distances to reach school, transit costs and access can pose real barriers to education and after school opportunities. At the same time, fare-free programs require substantial and ongoing public investment, raising important questions about whether eliminating fares alone is enough to meaningfully change student travel behavior.

In October 2021, LA Metro—the largest transit agency in Los Angeles County—launched the GoPass pilot program in partnership with other transit operators and multiple school districts, providing free transit passes to K-14 students. To better understand how GoPass influences student travel, who participates, and why, the research team examined student travel behavior, perceptions, and program participation across two complementary studies. One focused on Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD), including a survey of 1,800 LACCD students, while the other focused on high school students in a predominantly low-income school district.

policy brief

Transportation System Performance: Should We Redefine Induced Demand?

Abstract

In Walkable City, Jeff Speck says that induced demand is the thing that everyone in city planning understands but doesn’t talk about. It may be more accurate to categorize induced demand as the thing that everyone in city planning talks about but doesn’t understand. The issue is muddied by inconsistent definitions of relevant terminology.

This brief explores the various dimensions of induced demand. It is suggested that the term induced demand be used only when referring to the number of trips produced, and that it should not be used when referring to the other characteristics of these trips, such as destination, mode, time-of-day, or path.

policy brief

Mobility Wallets Expand Opportunity and Quality of Life for Low-Income Travelers

Abstract

Transportation costs place a disproportionate financial burden on low-income households. Families in the lowest income quintile spend roughly 32 percent of their household income on transportation, which combined with housing costs, can consume nearly all their available budget. Transit affordability is typically addressed by providing discounted public transit fares. But transit alone cannot meet every trip need, and without access to a car or other affordable alternatives low-income travelers may forgo trips — reducing social connections, limiting employment opportunities, and eroding their well-being. To address this gap, Los Angeles’ Mobility Wallet Pilot Program, administered by LA Metro and the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, provided 1,000 low-income residents in South Los Angeles $150 per month on a prepaid card. The card could be used across a range of shared transportation modes, including public transit, ridehail, carshare, bikes, scooters, and regional bus or rail. The research team interviewed 31 program participants before, during, and after the one-year pilot to understand changes in their travel patterns and the ongoing transportation challenges they face.

Icon for peer review journal article preprint

preprint journal article

No Car, No Choice: Transportation Resources and School Choice in California

Abstract

School choice offers families an opportunity for children to attend schools other than those they are zoned to by residential location. Most families live beyond walking distance to choice schools, so vehicular transportation is needed to attend. Yet, most choice programs have not been designed with such access in mind, and most school bus programs are designed only for neighborhood schools. Such diminished access for children in households without cars presents an equity issue. This study examines the relationship between household transportation resources—automobiles, transit, and walkability—and the likelihood that children attend a choice school. The research team matches data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey California Add-On with school characteristics to identify the school each respondent ages 5–17 attends and the school to which school districts zoned them. The team then fit a model that predicts choice of school type: neighborhood zone public, choice public, or private. Controlling for student, household, transportation, neighborhood, and assigned zone school characteristics, a student in a household with at least one vehicle had more than double the predicted probability of attending a choice public school compared with a student in a zero-vehicle household. The difference in predicted probabilities grew for students who were low-income, non-white, or zoned to low-performing schools. Living in neighborhoods with high-quality public transit access or high walkability did not affect the probabilities. These findings underscore the importance of transportation resources in enabling families to send their children to schools that best fit their needs.

white paper

A Review of Pricing Strategies for Decarbonizing Transportation

Abstract

California’s ability to achieve its climate and mobility goals depends on addressing the growing gap between transportation infrastructure needs and the declining effectiveness of traditional fuel tax revenues. As electric vehicle adoption rises, fuel efficiency improves, and demands for resilient, multimodal systems expand, new approaches to transportation funding and demand management are required. This paper examines a range of mobility pricing strategies—including tolling, managed lanes, congestion charges, vehicle-based fees and feebates, distance-based user charges, and parking pricing—to evaluate their potential for enhancing financial sustainability, reducing congestion, and internalizing the environmental and social costs of driving. Particular attention is given to dynamic pricing, which can flexibly manage demand for both road and parking space, and to distance-based charges that offer a more equitable and efficient alternative to fuel taxes. The analysis highlights the importance of revenue allocation to ensure that pricing strategies not only generate funds but also support equitable investments in sustainable mobility options. While some approaches are well established, others require pilot testing and policy innovation. Given its policy leadership and commitment to climate action, California is well positioned to advance and integrate these strategies, shaping a comprehensive pricing framework that strengthens the state’s fiscal resilience while promoting a cleaner, more efficient, and more equitable transportation system.

policy brief

Revitalizing Downtowns May Help Transit Recovery—But It Won’t Be Enough

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated hybrid and remote work and online shopping. These changes caused a sharp decline in activity and transit use in downtowns across California, particularly in transit-oriented downtowns that account for a large share of statewide ridership. This decline has major implications for climate commitments, equity, and the economy. Public officials and business leaders are pursuing a range of strategies to revitalize downtowns and support transit recovery. However, transit ridership has still not returned to pre-pandemic levels. To support recovery efforts, this research analyzed which measures are most likely to generate substantial and lasting ridership gains in downtowns, focusing on five downtowns in the San Francisco Bay Area—San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, San Jose, and Walnut Creek. For each downtown, the research team examined ridership data before and after the pandemic, reviewed how transit agencies responded in terms of adjusting service or other actions, and consulted revitalization plans by cities and business improvement districts. The research team also conducted surveys and interviews with transit riders and city leaders.

policy brief

California Can Improve Access to Electric Vehicle Charging By Incorporating Equity, Price, and Grid Readiness Data

Abstract

As California transitions to electric vehicles (EVs), ensuring equitable access to public charging remains a challenge. While the state and utilities have invested heavily in new charging infrastructure, simply counting stations does not show whether the network is reliable, affordable, and accessible, particularly for vulnerable populations and renters without home charging options. As of March 2025, California had installed about 178,549 public and shared-private chargers, including roughly 17,000 DC fast chargers. The California Energy Commission projects a need for about 1.01 million chargers by 2030 to support 7.5 million zero-emission vehicles. To better understand these dynamics, the research team developed a continuous, census tract-level monitoring system for the nine Bay Area counties that integrates information on charger availability, pricing, reliability, and grid capacity. This framework moves beyond static inventories to provide actionable, decision-grade insights for agencies responsible for EV infrastructure planning.

policy brief

Generalized Tools for Evaluating Active Transportation Projects Show Promise—But Project Level Estimates Need Other Support

Abstract

Cities and regions are increasingly investing in walking and bicycling infrastructure, driven by well-documented health, social, and environmental benefits of active transportation. However, most agencies lack practical tools to accurately assess whether these investments are achieving their intended outcomes. Accurately measuring change in walking and bicycling attributable to investments like new bike lanes or sidewalks is difficult and involves resources and expertise that is generally not feasible or financially sustainable for mode agencies. One promising solution is to develop generalized tools agencies can use to estimate project benefits using theory and prior empirical evidence, which reduces the burden of evaluation. To explore the validity of tool-based evaluation this research evaluated two active travel volume estimation approaches using projects in the cities of Santa Barbara and Santa Cruz as case studies.

policy brief

Can California Power Electric Construction Equipment at Scale?

Publication Date

June 1, 2026

Author(s)

Shakib Kafashan, Jean-Daniel Saphores

Abstract

California’s climate policies are accelerating the transition to zero-emission vehicles, but the construction sector faces a major barrier: access to reliable power at job sites. While electric excavators and loaders are entering the market, many construction sites—often temporary and in remote or constrained locations—lack the electrical infrastructure needed to support them. Grid connections are often too costly and take too long to install for construction projects, and existing grid infrastructure was not designed to handle the power demand of heavy machinery. Without practical charging solutions, electrifying the construction sector may lag behind state goals. Meanwhile, construction equipment is contributing 1% to 2% of California’s total greenhouse gas emissions. To better understand these challenges, the research team reviewed existing research, assessed available charging technologies, and spoke with utilities and energy providers across California. The research focuses on identifying key barriers and practical pathways to support construction electrification.

policy brief

Understanding the Impacts of Telecommuting on Travel Behavior Before, During, and After the Pandemic

Abstract

California set ambitious goals for decarbonizing the transportation sector, including reducing the amount of per capita vehicle travel. This may mean shifting more travel to other modes of travel, such as ride-hailing (i.e., on-demand services such as Uber, Lyft, and taxis) and public transit. To better understand different types of non-automobile travelers, the research team examined the connections between the tour-based travel patterns of public transit and ride-hailing users and their household activities. The team’s analysis used an activity-based approach that considers daily travel patterns using tours and activity patterns as basic units of analysis. The researchers identified different subgroups or “classes” of riders based on the type of trips taken and modes used and then analyzed the socio-demographic composition of each class. All tours considered in the team’s study start and end at home, with at least one trip by ride-hail or transit. Additionally, tours were classified as work or non-work trips, and complex or simple trips.