policy brief

Road Usage Charges Could Reduce Costs for Rural Drivers but Show Minimal Effect on Disadvantaged Communities

Abstract

The gasoline tax, the primary source of transportation funding in California and United States, is rapidly losing effectiveness as vehicles become more fuel efficient and as electric vehicles enter the market. To address this funding shortfall, many states are exploring alternatives to the gas tax such as a road usage charge (RUC), which charge drivers based on miles traveled rather than fuel consumed. The 2021 federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) supports this transition by funding both national and state-level RUC pilot demonstrations. Despite growing momentum, questions remain about how RUCs affect equity. Policymakers are particularly concerned about whether rural residents, who often travel longer distances, or disadvantaged communities, who already face economic and mobility barriers, would be disproportionately burdened. To better understand these impacts, the research team examined how a revenue-neutral RUC in California would change the financial burden of switching from a gas tax to RUC, focusing on geographic and community differences.

policy brief

Transformative Community Planning Can Advance Mobility Justice

Abstract

Top-down transportation planning practices have historically ignored the needs and concerns of low-income communities of color. Federal funding guidelines, agency objectives, regional and local planning processes, and community priorities often conflict with each other at the expense of the health, safety, and livelihood of vulnerable populations. Decades of discriminatory government policies and disinvestment have enabled gentrification, particularly in underserved neighborhoods where new transportation investments make these areas more accessible and attractive to wealthier, often white, residents, which can lead to residential and commercial displacement as public investments increase land values and rents. Mobility justice, which treats mobility as a fundamental human right and promotes a version of transportation planning that incorporates distributive, procedural, and recognition justice, offers an alternative framework.

policy brief

Delivery Vans, Large Pickups, and Work Trucks Drive More, Pollute More but Remain the Least Electrified

Abstract

Medium-duty trucks in the Class 2b-3 range are a critical and overlooked segment in California’s vehicle market. These trucks—used as work vehicles, delivery vans, and large personal-use pickups—are disproportionately owned and used in rural and lower-income communities. While they make up a relatively small share of the overall truck fleet in California, they contribute disproportionately to fuel use and emissions due to their high annual mileage and low fuel efficiency. Electrification of these vehicles has lagged far behind both passenger cars and heavier commercial trucks. According to the California Air Resources Board’s EMFAC model, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) account for just 1.5% of Class 2b and 0.2% of Class 3 vehicles in California, compared to 6.9% of passenger vehicles. This gap reflects both technical barriers (e.g., range, payload, or towing capacity) and policy gaps, since many incentive and regulatory programs focus on fleet-owned, heavier Class 4-8 trucks or exclude consumer-owned pickups altogether. Additionally, Class 2b-3 vehicles, often classified differently in household vs. commercial datasets, has made it difficult to understand who owns them, how they’re used, or where the best opportunities for electrification lie. To better understand ownership, usage, and barriers to electrification, this project combined household survey data, fleet data, and interviews with vehicle owners. This research highlights the dual-use nature of these vehicles—often serving both work and household needs—and reveals the equity risks of leaving this segment behind in California’s clean transportation transition.

research report

Shared Micromobility Vehicle Design and Safety

Publication Date

October 1, 2025

Author(s)

Beth Ferguson, Jordan Blandino

Abstract

This study investigates the evolution of shared micromobility vehicle design and safety practices in the San Francisco Bay Area from 2017 to 2024. Shared micromobility includes e-bikes and e-scooters. Stakeholder interviews revealed that limited protected bike lanes, poorly designed or neglected e-bike and e-scooter fleets, deteriorating road infrastructure, and unsafe rider behavior have impeded the widespread adoption of shared micromobility in urban areas. There is a pressing need for consistent design standards for lighting, battery charging, braking systems, vehicle frames, and wheel sizing to further improve safety and vehicle durability. Recommendations include expanding protected bike lanes, improving road maintenance, offering e-bike riding lessons, promoting helmet use, and encouraging substance-free riding. Enhancing vehicle security and implementing battery safety protocols are also critical for improving charging accessibility and reducing theft and fire risks.

website

The Fight for Teralta Park: The History behind State Route 15 and California's First Freeway Cap

Publication Date

February 1, 2025

Author(s)

Paul Ong, Chhandara Pech, Jacob Wasserman, Andres F Ramirez, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Leila Ullmann, Megan Riley

Abstract

This storymap examines the history behind California’s first freeway cap in City Heights, San Diego—a testament, despite its reduced scope, to the community activists who pushed for reparations after decades of harm.

research report

Maximizing the Air Quality and Environmental Justice Benefits of Zero Emission Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment in California

Abstract

Diesel fuel powered off-road vehicles and equipment used in agriculture, construction, mining, and industry have significant air quality and public health impacts due to high levels of pollutant emissions. Replacing these with zero emission powertrains represents a key strategy for reducing the harmful environmental impacts. However, the air quality impacts of zero emission off-road vehicles have not been assessed. Using the CMAQ model, we find that fully converting the off-road sector to zero emission equipment can decrease annual PM2.5 up to 0.9 μg/m3 and reduce daily maximum 8-hr average (MDA8) ozone as much as 6 ppb in Southern California. Statewide, these improvements yield benefits to public health potentially ranging up to $22.0 billion annually. The results further demonstrate the ability of zero emission off-road equipment to achieve health benefits within socially and economically disadvantaged communities.

published journal article

State Preemption in Theory and Practice: The Case of Parking Requirements

Publication Date

October 17, 2025

Abstract

In U.S. law, states can override actions of local governments that contravene state interests. In practice, preemptions are often more ambiguous nudges, and local responses can vary by interpretation and interests. This paper explores one such case of state preemption: California’s 2022 law that limited local governments’ ability to require automobile parking. We find that the law’s complexity and ambiguity created intense debates about interpretations, in all jurisdictions, leading to heterogeneous implementation across cities. Local interests also motivated strategic responses to the law, which we present in a threefold taxonomy: cities interested in parking reform used it as a springboard; cities interested in parking reform but facing local resistance used it as a protective shield; recalcitrant cities treated it as an obstacle or subverted the law. Our analysis shows that preemption is not as clear cut as it seems, and what conditions help and hinder changes in actual outcomes.

policy brief

Switching to Zero Emission Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment Has Significant Air Quality and Environmental Justice Benefits in California

Abstract

Off-road vehicles and equipment (e.g., forklifts, tractors, dirt bikes) are a major source of air pollution in California due to their heavy reliance on diesel engines, which emit high levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and other emissions. These pollutants cause a range of health impacts, including respiratory diseases like asthma, increased cancer risk, premature death, and other ailments, and disproportionately affect low-income communities located near highways, freight hubs, ports, and industrial areas. To address this issue, California has a range of policies and programs in place seeking a cleaner off-road sector beginning with Executive Order N-79-20, which sets a goal of 100 percent transition to zero emission (ZE) off-road vehicles and equipment by 2035 where feasible. Reflecting this, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2022 California Scoping Plan outlines ambitious ZE technology adoption, including hydrogen fuel cell and battery electric technologies. To better understand the implications of both current and future policies, this study quantifies 1) the benefits of off-road emission reductions from current policy and 2) potential additional benefits that can be achieved by increasing ZE adoption of off-road vehicles and equipment over and above the level considered feasible in the Scoping Plan up to and including a full transition to ZE.

published journal article

Development of a Pavement Design Catalog Through CalME and Life Cycle Cost Analysis

Publication Date

October 4, 2025

Author(s)

Sampat Kedarisetty, John Harvey

Abstract

Pavement design has advanced from traditional empirical methods to mechanistic-empirical (ME) approaches. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the University of California Pavement Research Center (UCPRC) have developed the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ME Structural Analysis Program for Flexible Pavements (CalME) ME design method. A comprehensive pavement design catalog is essential to facilitate broader implementation, especially by local governments. This study aims to create a detailed pavement design catalog using the CalME program, assisting local officials in their pavement design processes. The catalog considers variations in climate, traffic, and structural pavement types across different regions in California, providing a ready-to-use resource for local government officials. Moreover, a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was conducted to optimize the pavement designs included in the catalog. The LCCA ensures economic efficiency throughout the pavement’s design life by accounting for construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs. Three pavement treatment strategies were evaluated: preservation, rehabilitation, and a combination of preservation and rehabilitation treatments. The findings of this study indicate that governmental agencies can make informed, climate region and subgrade-specific pavement design decisions and develop cost-effective maintenance plans for the entire pavement service life. The LCCA results show that preservation treatments are the most cost-effective in high-traffic areas, whereas rehabilitation treatments offer the most significant economic benefits in low-traffic areas.