research report

Road Usage Charges and Impacts on Rural and Disadvantaged Communities

Abstract

This report examines the differences in what drivers would pay with a gasoline tax versus a revenue-neutral road user charge (RUC) and whether these differences are equitably distributed among rural vs. urban and disadvantaged vs. non-disadvantaged communities. The analysis uses vehicle registration data from the California Department of Motor Vehicles, vehicle attribute data from DataOne, and environmental and socioeconomic indicators from CalEnviroScreen. On average, a transition from a gas tax to an RUC would cause drivers in rural areas to pay less per mile and drivers in urban areas to pay more. This difference arises because vehicles registered in rural areas tend to have lower fuel efficiency than those in urban areas. However, the transition from gas tax to RUC would have a similar impact on average cost per mile for vehicles registered in disadvantaged communities (defined as the top 10% of census tracts in CalEnviroScreen) as in other communities. This study indicates that RUCs are marginally less regressive than gas taxes.

research report

Class 2b-3 Vehicle Market in California: Ownership, Usage, and Electrification Potential

Abstract

Class 2b-3 vehicles, bridging the gap between light-duty and heavy-duty trucks, represent a critical yet underexplored segment in California’s decarbonization efforts. These medium-duty vehicles, weighing 8,501-14,000 lbs., play diverse roles across personal and commercial sectors but remain behind in electrification compared to other vehicle classes. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of Class 2b-3 vehicle ownership, usage patterns, and electrification potential in California, leveraging county-level registration data, household and commercial vehicle surveys, and qualitative interviews. Findings reveal significant geographic, socio-economic, and operational disparities: rural and lower-income counties exhibit higher concentrations of Class 2b-3 vehicles, while electric vehicle (EV) adoption – driven mainly by lighter vehicle classes – remains concentrated in urban, high income areas. Commercial vehicles in this class demonstrate higher mileage and lower fuel efficiency than standard commercial vehicles, amplifying their emissions impact. Despite these challenges, policy initiatives such as California’s Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) and emerging vehicle technologies signal pathways for electrification. However, barriers persist, including high upfront costs, range requirements, and infrastructure gaps. The study indicates that targeted interventions, especially in rural areas, and flexible technology solutions are essential to accelerate electrification and ensure equitable clean transportation access across California.

research report

Transformative Community Planning as a Tool for Advancing Mobility Justice: Two Case Studies Using Community-Based Participatory Action Research and Racial Equity Impact Assessment

Abstract

Top-down transportation planning practices have historically ignored the needs and concerns of low-income communities of color, which can lead to residential and commercial displacement as public investments increase land values and rents. The concept of mobility justice centers the needs of communities that have historically been excluded from transportation planning decisions. We partnered with community groups to examine two transportation planning projects in the Bay Area using collaborative research methods. The first was a retrospective analysis of the East Bay Bus Rapid Transit project in East Oakland that reflects the harms of top-down planning. The second study examined the City of Richmond’s Transformative Climate Communities projects, a more collaborative approach to planning with low-income communities involved at every stage. The top-down planning model employed in the East Oakland case study resulted in significant health, safety, and displacement impacts that could have been avoided. The Richmond case study shows project changes occurring as a direct result of using mobility justice principles.

policy brief

Road Usage Charges Could Reduce Costs for Rural Drivers but Show Minimal Effect on Disadvantaged Communities

Abstract

The gasoline tax, the primary source of transportation funding in California and United States, is rapidly losing effectiveness as vehicles become more fuel efficient and as electric vehicles enter the market. To address this funding shortfall, many states are exploring alternatives to the gas tax such as a road usage charge (RUC), which charge drivers based on miles traveled rather than fuel consumed. The 2021 federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) supports this transition by funding both national and state-level RUC pilot demonstrations. Despite growing momentum, questions remain about how RUCs affect equity. Policymakers are particularly concerned about whether rural residents, who often travel longer distances, or disadvantaged communities, who already face economic and mobility barriers, would be disproportionately burdened. To better understand these impacts, the research team examined how a revenue-neutral RUC in California would change the financial burden of switching from a gas tax to RUC, focusing on geographic and community differences.

policy brief

Delivery Vans, Large Pickups, and Work Trucks Drive More, Pollute More but Remain the Least Electrified

Abstract

Medium-duty trucks in the Class 2b-3 range are a critical and overlooked segment in California’s vehicle market. These trucks—used as work vehicles, delivery vans, and large personal-use pickups—are disproportionately owned and used in rural and lower-income communities. While they make up a relatively small share of the overall truck fleet in California, they contribute disproportionately to fuel use and emissions due to their high annual mileage and low fuel efficiency. Electrification of these vehicles has lagged far behind both passenger cars and heavier commercial trucks. According to the California Air Resources Board’s EMFAC model, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) account for just 1.5% of Class 2b and 0.2% of Class 3 vehicles in California, compared to 6.9% of passenger vehicles. This gap reflects both technical barriers (e.g., range, payload, or towing capacity) and policy gaps, since many incentive and regulatory programs focus on fleet-owned, heavier Class 4-8 trucks or exclude consumer-owned pickups altogether. Additionally, Class 2b-3 vehicles, often classified differently in household vs. commercial datasets, has made it difficult to understand who owns them, how they’re used, or where the best opportunities for electrification lie. To better understand ownership, usage, and barriers to electrification, this project combined household survey data, fleet data, and interviews with vehicle owners. This research highlights the dual-use nature of these vehicles—often serving both work and household needs—and reveals the equity risks of leaving this segment behind in California’s clean transportation transition.

policy brief

Transformative Community Planning Can Advance Mobility Justice

Abstract

Top-down transportation planning practices have historically ignored the needs and concerns of low-income communities of color. Federal funding guidelines, agency objectives, regional and local planning processes, and community priorities often conflict with each other at the expense of the health, safety, and livelihood of vulnerable populations. Decades of discriminatory government policies and disinvestment have enabled gentrification, particularly in underserved neighborhoods where new transportation investments make these areas more accessible and attractive to wealthier, often white, residents, which can lead to residential and commercial displacement as public investments increase land values and rents. Mobility justice, which treats mobility as a fundamental human right and promotes a version of transportation planning that incorporates distributive, procedural, and recognition justice, offers an alternative framework.

research report

Shared Micromobility Vehicle Design and Safety

Publication Date

October 1, 2025

Author(s)

Beth Ferguson, Jordan Blandino

Abstract

This study investigates the evolution of shared micromobility vehicle design and safety practices in the San Francisco Bay Area from 2017 to 2024. Shared micromobility includes e-bikes and e-scooters. Stakeholder interviews revealed that limited protected bike lanes, poorly designed or neglected e-bike and e-scooter fleets, deteriorating road infrastructure, and unsafe rider behavior have impeded the widespread adoption of shared micromobility in urban areas. There is a pressing need for consistent design standards for lighting, battery charging, braking systems, vehicle frames, and wheel sizing to further improve safety and vehicle durability. Recommendations include expanding protected bike lanes, improving road maintenance, offering e-bike riding lessons, promoting helmet use, and encouraging substance-free riding. Enhancing vehicle security and implementing battery safety protocols are also critical for improving charging accessibility and reducing theft and fire risks.

website

The Fight for Teralta Park: The History behind State Route 15 and California's First Freeway Cap

Publication Date

February 1, 2025

Author(s)

Paul Ong, Chhandara Pech, Jacob Wasserman, Andres F Ramirez, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Leila Ullmann, Megan Riley

Abstract

This storymap examines the history behind California’s first freeway cap in City Heights, San Diego—a testament, despite its reduced scope, to the community activists who pushed for reparations after decades of harm.

research report

Maximizing the Air Quality and Environmental Justice Benefits of Zero Emission Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment in California

Abstract

Diesel fuel powered off-road vehicles and equipment used in agriculture, construction, mining, and industry have significant air quality and public health impacts due to high levels of pollutant emissions. Replacing these with zero emission powertrains represents a key strategy for reducing the harmful environmental impacts. However, the air quality impacts of zero emission off-road vehicles have not been assessed. Using the CMAQ model, we find that fully converting the off-road sector to zero emission equipment can decrease annual PM2.5 up to 0.9 μg/m3 and reduce daily maximum 8-hr average (MDA8) ozone as much as 6 ppb in Southern California. Statewide, these improvements yield benefits to public health potentially ranging up to $22.0 billion annually. The results further demonstrate the ability of zero emission off-road equipment to achieve health benefits within socially and economically disadvantaged communities.