Drivers’ Responses to Eco-driving Applications: Effects on Fuel Consumption and Driving Safety

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

August 19, 2020 - December 31, 2021

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Campus(es)

UC Berkeley

Project Summary

Climate change in California could have a large impact on the state’s economy, natural, and public health. One strategy to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector is eco-driving. With the advance of connected-vehicle technologies, dynamic eco-driving uses real-time vehicle-specific information to optimize the vehicle speed and reduce fuel consumption and emissions. However, the effectiveness of eco-driving is seriously compromised by two issues: drivers’ interactions with the in-vehicle displays and lack of compliance with the real-time guidance. For the eco-driving applications to be optimally utilized and widely adopted, such challenges must be properly addressed. This project proposes to explore the two issues through a driving simulator experiment. Two types of roadways will be investigated, including local roadway with signalized intersections, and freeway stop-and-go traffic. Two well-established connectivity-based eco-driving velocity planning algorithms will be experimentally evaluated. Through findings of this project, the research team expects to provide policy makers with (1) realistic estimations of benefits of eco-driving applications; (2) countermeasures for higher compliance rate; (3) guidelines for safer interface design; and (4) guidance regarding increasing public awareness and adoption of eco-driving technologies.

Categorizing and Prioritizing Trip Types to Support California’s VMT Reduction Goals

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

October 27, 2022 - April 30, 2025

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is a well-accepted measure of the amount of travel taking place on a transportation system and thus, that system’s climate impacts and sustainability characteristics. California Senate Bill (SB) 375 establishes a process for setting regional-level targets to reduce VMT, which necessitates incorporating VMT-based analysis into transportation planning and modeling in practice. The issue is whether VMT needs to be further classified into “types of VMT” that can be incorporated into the process to provide more sensitive policy analysis. Trips differ in both their purpose and in the mode or vehicle used, and consequently, VMT can be viewed as better or worse for economic productivity and sustainability based on these characteristics. For example, some car trips can be accomplished with web-based devices. Little research has pursued this notion for policy-making purposes. Using available data on trip purposes, and on vehicle mixes (in terms of fuel usage and environmental impact) used for trips, productivity-based indices can be developed to properly assess the environmental/energy impacts of the VMT associated with broad classes of trips.

This project utilizes various data sources and an existing transportation system planning and analysis model (for a selected case study network) to develop methods for identifying and prioritizing potential VMT categories. Researchers will then use this information to evaluate the impact of different policies. This initial study will also serve as a trial for larger studies to evaluate system-wide policy implications. VMT category-based pricing, subsidy, taxation and land-use policies can be tested in selected network case studies. One simple example would be taxing VMT from electric vehicles less than gasoline powered vehicles.

Road Capacity as a Fundamental Determinant of Vehicle Travel

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

June 1, 2022 - September 30, 2024

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Susan Handy, Michael Rosen

Project Summary

Most of California’s success in reducing transportation emissions over the last 20 years can be attributed to improvements in vehicle efficiency and the adoption of lower-carbon fuels, particularly electricity. California must also reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in order to meet critical climate goals and to enjoy the many co-benefits of reduced driving, such as improved air quality, safety, and public health. Increasing active transportation and transit options are two key strategies that California regions are using to try to reduce VMT, but to date, these projects have not been able to significantly cut VMT. One potential explanation is induced travel demand. Just as adding a highway lane reduces congestion and travel times and thereby induces more people to drive, the same outcome may occur when rapid transit and bike facilities are constructed. As these facilities attract former drivers, congestion is reduced, and more or new drivers backfill the roadway capacity that was freed up. This project investigates two questions. First, to what extent are VMT reductions from transit and active transportation backfilled by induced traffic? Second, is roadway and parking infrastructure the primary, long-run determinant of VMT in congested urban areas? The second question will explore the extent to which infrastructure needs to be sized proportionately to nearby highway capacity if regional and statewide VMT and greenhouse gas reduction goals are to be realized.

Streamlining the CEQA Process in Transit Rich Areas

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

June 14, 2022 - March 31, 2024

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Davis, UC Irvine

Project Summary

California faces major policy challenges that stem in part from decades of planning for automobility. For one, the state cannot meet its ambitious decarbonization targets without reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transportation sector, which produces nearly 40 percent of California’s emissions. Substantial reductions in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are likely needed to meet the state’s climate change goals. In addition, the state is mired in a historic housing supply and affordability crisis. It ranks 49th in the United States in housing units per capita. It needs millions more units to meet demand, including 1.3 million more affordable rental units, according to one estimate. Transit oriented development (TOD), with denser housing around transit hubs, can solve both challenges—reducing driving and producing more housing. However, TOD is often difficult to achieve in practice. One frequently cited roadblock to TOD is the environmental review process under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which can add considerable time, cost, and uncertainty to TOD plans and developments. There have been numerous attempts to exempt or provide a streamlined CEQA review process for TOD projects, including through Senate Bill (SB) 375 projects (and infill developments generally). These efforts are often “criticized for layering on so many project level restrictions that no developments succeed in meeting all the eligibility requirements.” However, there is limited empirical research on how frequently the provisions have actually been used or how successful they have been at streamlining the entitlement process for TOD projects.

This research project will explore the use and effect of the two CEQA streamlining provisions in SB 375 for TOD projects. One provision exempts qualifying transit priority projects (TPPs) from CEQA review entirely (Public Resources Code § 21155.1). The other provision streamlines CEQA review for qualifying TPPs (Public Resources Code § 21155.2). The researchers will catalog projects that have utilized these provisions, identify projects that likely could have taken advantage of SB 375 CEQA streamlining but did not, and interview planners and developers involved with a subset of both sets of projects. The outcome will be an in-depth exploration of how much SB 375 streamlining actually helps reduce the time, cost, and uncertainty of permitting TOD projects, and how it could be improved to better meet those goals.

Pandemic-related Shifts in Work, Travel, and Transit Use: Implications for Public Policy

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

July 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023

Principal Investigator

Project Summary

While the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected travel and transportation systems, driving has largely returned to pre-pandemic levels, even as a significantly larger share of the workforce works from home full- or part-time. However, there have been significant changes in the timing and patterns of car travel since before the pandemic. Moreover, public transit systems have been especially hard hit, and riders have proven slow to return. While transit use by those unable to drive (who are more likely poor, immigrants, people of color, and/or disabled) has substantially recovered since the shutdowns in the spring of 2020, daily commuting to and from major employment centers collapsed and is just beginning to recover. The shifts in motor vehicle travel and the more dramatic changes in public transit use are both likely related to workplace changes, as the number of remote and hybrid workers has increased. The longer-term effects of the pandemic on travel remain uncertain, as do the appropriate policy responses to changing traffic patterns broadly, and to depressed transit ridership specifically. Public transit is a key transportation pillar of California’s climate and equity goals, which will be harder to meet with driving up and transit riding down. This research will investigate how metropolitan travel patterns have shifted in the late stages of the pandemic and what these shifts imply for driving and public transit use in the years ahead. The project will build on current research underway in Northern and Southern California drawing on and integrating both survey and mobile device data that reflect traveler movements before and during the pandemic. Specifically, it will look at how these pandemic-induced shifts in travel relate to the rise of working from home, how this might affect the demand for public transit in the future, and what evidence-based policy recommendations can be offered to state, regional, and local transportation agencies to better respond to and address these new patterns of travel demand.

Factors Affecting Development Decisions and Construction Delay of Housing in Transit-Accessible and Jobs-Rich Areas in California

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

September 1, 2020 - August 30, 2021

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Jae Hong Kim, Douglas Houston, Moira O’Neill, Eric Biber, Douglas Houston, Sarah Lindbergh, Narae Lee, Giulia Gualco-Nelson

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

Recent state legislation has attempted to address California’s housing affordability crisis by encouraging new development in transit-accessible and/or jobs-rich areas. But policymakers lack adequate information in two key areas: the effects of transportation laws and plans on the decisions of developers regarding whether and where to build housing; and the determinants of delays in approvals for proposed projects in jobs-rich and transit-accessible areas. Drawing on a unique dataset detailing all residential projects of five units or more that were approved from 2014 through 2017 in seven Southern California jurisdictions, this project will analyze the extent to which transportation policies, rules, plans, and investments influence the location of new housing and delay the construction of new housing. Using descriptive statistics and multivariate modeling, the research team will examine developers’ decisions concerning whether and where to build housing, identifying how project-level attributes and contextual variables, including those related to transportation, affect decisions about whether and where to build infill projects in jobs-rich and transit-rich locations. This work will also include a systematic comparison of permitting timelines for otherwise comparable projects with different degrees of transit availability or job accessibility, along with multivariate modeling to assess the determinants of delay.

Micromobility Trip Characteristics, Transit Connections, and COVID-19 Effects

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

July 1, 2020 - September 30, 2021

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Project Summary

While micromobility services (e.g., bike share, e-bike share, e-scooter share) hold great potential for providing clean travel, estimating the effects of those services on vehicle miles traveled and reducing greenhouse gases is challenging. Government agencies are just beginning to discuss ways to incentivize micromobility services to achieve these goals. California has taken one step in this direction through the SB 1014 (2018) Clean Miles Standard and Incentive Program. With this law, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) wants to better understand the characteristics of micromobility systems to help set regulations for Transportation Network Companies (TNC) to reduce emissions. This project proposes to help inform CARB’s regulations by summarizing micromobility trip characteristics using an archive of “big data” from the General Bikeshare Feed Specification data (in 28 North American cities) pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19, estimate micromobility mode substitution from existing survey data and a literature review, and estimate the effects of micromobility on transit ridership. The project results are expected to directly influence CARB’s regulations of TNCs, but will also be pertinent for future state and local incentives and regulations of micromobility services.

research report

Stockton’s Crosstown Freeway, Urban Renewal, and Asian Americans: Systemic Causes and Impacts

Abstract

This project uses mixed methods to examine the systemic causes and consequences of the construction of Stockton, California’s Crosstown Freeway, and urban redevelopment for Asian American communities. Stockton underwent spatial restructuring in the decades after the Second World War, and state and local governments contributed and responded to these changes by implementing connected freeway and urban renewal programs. Historical and contemporaneous xenophobia and racism placed Chinatown, Japantown, and Little Manila in their path, with these enclaves deemed blighted and subject to “slum clearance.” The choice of freeway route was racially biased. The neighborhood surrounding an unchosen route was predominantly white, whereas that of the chosen route was predominantly home to people of color. Freeway construction during the 1960s and 1970s directly displaced hundreds of people and housing units downtown— mainly people of color, particularly Asians. The communities most harmed were the Asian American enclaves, where the housing stock declined by about three-quarters between 1960 and 1970. The losses were not only physical, as the freeway and redevelopment eviscerated once vibrant ethnic commercial hubs. Because of long-standing economic and political marginalization, Asian Americans were relatively powerless to prevent the destruction; nonetheless, they fought to build affordable housing for their people, protect and in some cases relocate cultural institutions, and support surviving ethnic businesses. In the long run, Stockton failed to revitalize its downtown, while destroying its cultural diversity. The findings can help reform and improve professional practice within the transportation arena to ensure racial fairness and equity.

A Quantitative Investigation into the Impact of Partially Automated Vehicles on Vehicle Miles Travelled in California

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2019 - December 31, 2020

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Gil Tal, Debapriya Chakraborty

Project Summary

Current research on vehicle automation is primarily focused on fully autonomous vehicles, however semi-autonomous vehicles are already available on the market. These vehicles will have an impact on drivers’ travel patterns due to changes in the utility of driving (e.g. reduced driver fatigue, increased ability to multitask). These vehicles have the potential to change travel patterns and could lead to increases in vehicle miles travelled (VMT). This may have negative consequences for road networks and the environment. This project will be the first to investigate what impact these vehicles are already having on travel behavior. In depth interviews with owners of semi-autonomous vehicles will be conducted to gain a better understanding of how and if these vehicles are resulting in more VMT. The interviews will explore any changes to driver’s travel patterns including their willingness to drive, and willingness to drive longer distances. The interviews will focus on driver’s commute distances and will explore whether having a semi-autonomous or autonomous vehicle has or would lead to drivers being willing to travel longer commute distances (e.g., by moving home location or work location).

Investigating Opportunities to Mobilize Community Associations to Promote Sustainable Transportation and Land Use

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

September 25, 2023 - January 31, 2025

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

In recent decades, common-interest housing developments have become prevalent in many American cities. According to the Community Associations Institute’s 2021 estimates, nearly 30% of the U.S. population now lives in a development or area governed by a community association, with homeowners associations being the most common type. Despite the widespread presence of homeowners associations (HOAs), there has been limited research on how they impact the adoption of new mobility technologies, innovative urban neighborhood designs, and sustainable land use and transportation initiatives. HOAs and similar community governing bodies have the authority to impose additional restrictions on community activities, which has often led to them being perceived as obstacles to achieving a more environmentally friendly and inclusive future. While this perception is grounded in reality, it doesn’t fully account for the significant variation in how HOAs operate. This perspective also hinders innovative thinking about how HOAs could contribute to creating more sustainable communities. Exploring ways to engage these influential entities in pursuing various planning objectives is crucial.

This project will improve the collective understanding of how HOAs and other community associations impact sustainable land use and transportation. The researchers will achieve this by: i) creating an integrated geospatial database that includes information about HOAs, land uses (including Accessory Dwelling Units, or ADUs), and transportation indicators, ii) investigating the relationship between the presence or absence of HOAs and factors such as ADU construction, travel patterns, and the built environment, and iii) identifying best practices and extracting lessons from successful cases.