policy brief

Gaining Wait? Analyzing the Congestion Impacts of Road Diets in Los Angeles

policy brief

Consumer Awareness of Plug-in Electric Vehicles: A Study of Sacramento

Abstract

California has ambitious goals for transitioning to cleaner vehicles. In 2012, California set a target of 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) on the road by 2025 and, in 2018, set a target of 5 million ZEVs on the road by 2030. However, Californians are largely unaware of the state’s efforts to dramatically increase ZEV adoption [1]. From 2014 to 2017, consumer awareness, knowledge, and purchase considerations of ZEVs in California did not change. This is despite significant state investments in ZEV purchase incentives, a doubling of charging stations and vehicle models for sale, and an increase in the ZEV market share from 3.3% of new car sales in 2014 to 5% in 2017.Achieving California’s ambitious ZEV targets will require a substantial increase in the number of consumers who go through the sequential stages of adoption. First, consumers must be aware the vehicles exist; then they need to become more knowledgeable of the pros and cons of the vehicles, including, but not limited to, available incentives (both monetary and non-monetary) and the availability of charging infrastructure. They will then consider purchasing a ZEV by weighing the pros and cons before finally making a decision.

policy brief

Adult Bicycle Education Classes Increase Confidence, Feelings of Safety, and Knowledge of Bicycling Rules

Abstract

Adult bicycle education classes are becoming an increasingly popular strategy to improve safety, mitigate congestion, and reach environmental goals. However, there is limited empirical research on the effectiveness of these classes among adults, and there are no studies evaluating the impacts of classroom-based education on this population. To address this gap in knowledge, a study was conducted evaluating the effectiveness of classroom-based adult bicycle education on delivering changes related to bicycling activity, self-perceptions while bicycling, knowledge of the bicycling rules of the road, and mode choice in the San Francisco Bay Area. Evaluation of the intervention was conducted using self-administered surveys completed prior to the intervention and again six weeks after the course. Self-reported data was validated using objective data collected using the Ride Report app.

policy brief

Research on the Effects of Bicycle Education is Limited but Does Point to Higher Rates of Bicycling and Increased Safety

Abstract

Increasing the number of people bicycling is often proposed as a solution for addressing environmental and climate-related challenges. Strategies to support more bicycling have traditionally included building bicycle infrastructure, enforcing traffic laws, and educating people about bicycling. Additionally, many cities across California are pursuing Vision Zero, the goal to eliminate traffic death and serious injury in the next decade. In San Francisco, for example, Vision Zero strategies include creating safe streets, safe people and safe vehicles.1 It also seeks to include training on “bicycle education, safety, and laws to adults” as a strategy for helping adults learn to bicycle more safely. 2With more than 44 of the 50 largest U.S. cities offering adult bicycle education classes, educational programs are becoming increasingly popular. 3 While studies show that infrastructure such as protected bicycle lanes is effective in encouraging bicycle use, the effectiveness of educational programs in improving bicycling, encouraging bicycle use, and replacing auto trips remains to be determined

research report

Can Smog Repairs Create Social Justice? The Tune In & Tune Up Smog Repair Program in the San Joaquin Valley

Abstract

N/A

research report

Autonomous Vehicles in the United States: Understanding Why and How Cities and Regions Are Responding

Abstract

This report analyzes how cities, transit agencies, and metropolitan planning organizations are responding to autonomous vehicles (AVs), both in terms of current testing and pilot services, as well as the long-term implications of broad AV adoption. The report is based on 21 interviews with staff at cities, transportation agencies, MPOs, and select AV companies, as well as extensive document reviews. The research team found a broad spectrum of activity on the part of the public sector regarding autonomous vehicles, as well as a taxonomy of motivations, which ranged from attempting to harness these vehicles to help boost transit ridership, to speeding the adoption of road pricing, increasing density, stimulating technology-sector economic development, generating revenue, and improving pedestrian safety. Agency responses to AV testing vary dramatically – from complex permitting processes and RFPs to intentional delay in developing policy so as not to deter AV activity. Publicly led AV shuttles provide the largest opportunity for municipalities to shape AV testing, while private passenger AV testing and pilot services often provide inadequate information to cities to appraise their operations. A prospective future in which autonomous vehicles make up a large share of travel has led some “early adopter” agencies to develop policies such as partnerships between public transit and AV services, changes to zoning codes to reduce parking requirements in exchange for AV drop-off and pick-up zones, and plans to tax AV passenger trips.