Applying Racial, Health, and Mobility Equity to Transit-Oriented Development: A Case Study Approach in East Oakland and Richmond

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

August 16, 2023 - March 31, 2025

Principal Investigator

Areas of Expertise

Safety, Public Health, & Mobility Justice Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Berkeley

Project Summary

Low income communities of color in formerly redlined neighborhoods face persistent racial disparities and inequities in pollution exposure, access to transportation and safe streets, and inadequate provisions for health, safety, stable housing, clean air, education, and employment. To ensure that new transportation infrastructure investments benefit these communities without exacerbating existing environmental disparities, gentrification, and displacement, this research project employs a case study approach in East Oakland and Richmond, guided by Community Based Participatory Action Research (CBPAR) principles.  The Applying Racial, Health, and Mobility Equity to Transit Oriented Development Research Project will:  1) Apply a Racial Equity Impact Assessment (REIA) to examine how “race-neutral” transit-oriented development policies have impacted low income residents’ access to health, economic stability, housing, and social cohesion and belonging; 2) Utilize mixed methods research, including public agency data and community knowledge, to analyze the intersection of transportation, air quality, land use, housing, displacement and health outcomes at regional and neighborhood levels; and 3) Provide for a greater understanding of the regional and neighborhood level impacts of ports and transportation systems and policies.  

Dining or Parking? Managing the Curb During COVID-19 and Beyond: An Analysis of the L.A. Al Fresco Program

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2022 - June 16, 2023

Principal Investigator

Graham Rossmore

Areas of Expertise

Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UCLA

Project Summary

The temporary L.A. Al Fresco outdoor dining program provided crucial support to restaurants, bars and cafes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research performs an economic analysis of the program, comparing parking meter revenue with sales tax revenue and compares treatment corridors with Al Fresco to control corridors without Al Fresco. Results show the program has been successful in keeping more than 80% of businesses open during the pandemic. Treatment corridors with Al Fresco generated an increase of $12 million in gross sales in 2022 compared to 2019. The City of Los Angeles stands to benefit economically and socially by transitioning into a permanent L.A. Al Fresco program.

Working From Home and its Effects on Post-Pandemic Travel

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

November 1, 2022 - December 31, 2023

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Julene Paul, Fariba Siddiq, Samuel Speroni

Areas of Expertise

Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UCLA

Project Summary

While many aspects of life have largely returned to pre-pandemic patterns as the COVID-19 pandemic has become endemic, several aspects of travel remain unsettled and uncertain. In particular, the forced experiment of working from home for at least half of the labor force in 2020 is evolving into a new normal where perhaps a third of all workers split their work hours between office and home. This has had especially significant effects on public transit, which has traditionally carried a disproportionate share of commute trips, but these new work patterns have affected the timing and character of many other trips as well. These evolving patterns of travel may call into question many current transportation policies and plans that are premised on (now) outdated ideas about travel.

This project builds on recent projects examining: (1) research on telecommuting and travel and (2) data from the company StreetLight Data for the Southern California Association of Governments region on the shifting timing of trip-making and its implications for public transit demand. This project considers the shifts in the patterns of trip purposes and their implications for traffic and travel. For example, fewer commute trips mean fewer opportunities to combine shopping and other errands with trips to and from work. Instead, workers may be more likely to take breaks during their workdays to run errands and grocery shop. This may mean that peak hour congestion will be lower (due to fewer commute trips and to fewer errands as part of those commute trips), but more vehicle travel (due to more freestanding trips from home and less trip chaining). Such shifts, if borne out by the data, have implications for efforts to reduce both congestion (good) and increase vehicle travel (bad), and those results inform policy making in this regard.

Drayage Truck Activity and California Inland Ports

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

October 1, 2022 - March 31, 2025

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Andre Tok, Yiqiao Li

Areas of Expertise

Freight, Logistics, & Supply Chain Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

The ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland are the top, second and eighth busiest container ports in the United States. However, the highway networks surrounding these ports are highly congested due to drayage truck operations. Since warehouse space at the ports for transferring cargo to delivery trucks is limited, drayage trips must traverse metropolitan areas to reach scattered distribution centers. This creates significant traffic congestion and amplifies other problems like noise and air pollution in communities located nearby. While locating additional distribution centers near the ports may alleviate dock storage constraints and minimize negative impacts on local streets and communities, available land for development is scarce and prohibitively expensive. Inland “dry ports” operate as intermodal distribution facilities for loading and unloading standardized shipping containers transferred from docked ships via major highways or railroads. They can be located away from population centers to minimize their impacts on local communities and road networks, and therefore can address the traffic and community impacts of drayage truck activity. However, additional data on portside freight activities are needed to assess their potential benefits. Existing truck activity data collected by onboard telematics systems provide a picture of drayage truck trip activity but are limited and typically deployed on larger fleets and thus may not provide an accurate representation of overall drayage activity. Alternative data sources like UC Irvine’s Truck Activity Monitoring System (TAMS) show potential. It captures truck classification data from inductive loop sensors located throughout Southern California and can identify drayage trucks. However, it requires further enhancement to accurately measure drayage truck volumes along highway corridors. This study will provide a better understanding of the impacts associated with developing an inland port serving the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The team will perform a comprehensive review of studies associated with inland ports within the United States and the rest of the world. This review will provide insights on factors affecting the implementation, design, and operation of inland ports, and assess the benefits and costs of developing inland ports to serve California’s major ports. As telematics data sources represent only a small sample of drayage truck activity, the next step is to enhance the ability to measure the impacts of current drayage truck activities on the metropolitan road network. TAMS coverage is being expanded in the Inland Empire with additional site deployments through a concurrent study. This study will improve the accuracy of the truck classification model and yield a significant dataset of drayage truck activity in the Los Angeles metropolitan area and the Inland Empire to assess the potential impact of inland ports on highway congestion.

Teleworking, Travel, and Quality of Life Before, During, and After the Pandemic Across Different Population Groups in the U.S.

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

October 1, 2022 - June 30, 2024

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Areas of Expertise

Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic and the imposed social distancing measures led many people to adopt telecommuting arrangements — working from home or teleworking — on a large scale. A recent survey found that, between February and May 2020, over one-third of the American labor force swapped in-person work with telework, which increased the share of remote working to nearly 50 percent of the nation’s workforce. These massive changes in work arrangements may have long-term impacts, including how work is organized, where work is performed, and how activities and travel are scheduled. If telecommuting continues it is important to know whether it results in less travel, less commute stress, and consequently a happier life.

This study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telecommuting (working from home) and travel during the first year of the pandemic in the United States (from March 2020 to March 2021), with a particular focus on examining the variation in impact across different geographies. The 50 U.S. states are divided into several clusters based on their geographic and telecommuting characteristics, including 6 small urban states, 8 large urban states, 18 urban–rural mixed states, and 17 rural states. Combining data from multiple sources, this study finds that nearly one-third of the U.S. workforce worked from home during the pandemic, which was six times higher than the pre-pandemic period, and that these fractions varied across the clusters. More people worked from home in urban states compared with rural states. As well as telecommuting, several activity travel trends were also examined across these clusters: reduction in the number of activity visits; changes in the number of trips and vehicle-miles traveled; and mode usage. Findings show there was a greater reduction in the number of workplace and nonworkplace visits in urban states compared with rural states. The number of trips in all distance categories decreased except for long-distance trips, which increased during the summer and fall of 2020. The changes in overall mode usage frequency were similar across urban and rural states with a large drop in ride-hailing and transit use.

Transportation Equity and Justice Through Community-Driven Planning: Lessons from California’s San Joaquin Valley

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

October 1, 2022 - June 30, 2024

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Gregg Macey

Areas of Expertise

Safety, Public Health, & Mobility Justice Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

Addressing the disparate impacts of climate change requires a better understanding of how the transportation sector can integrate community-driven processes and solutions into plans and programs in collaboration with public agencies and other stakeholders. The Community Air Protection Program, administered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), provides a valuable case study of the promise and challenge of improving transportation equity through community-led planning efforts. Since its launch in 2018, CARB has selected 17 disadvantaged communities to develop community air monitoring plans (CAMPs) and/or community emissions reduction plans (CERPs) as directed by Assembly Bill 617 (AB 617). Although transportation emission sources feature prominently in CAMPs and CERPs (e.g., freight transport, zero-emission technologies, alternative modes), AB 617 evaluation studies have not investigated the role that transportation concerns played in community selection, goal setting, and outcome assessment. This project will conduct a retrospective evaluation of equity principles and processes employed in the selection, development, and implementation of CAMPs and CERFs in four San Joaquin Valley communities. The study will focus on communities that took part in a process led by the Central Valley Air Quality Coalition to nominate a subset of 40 communities to participate in air monitoring and emissions reduction planning through AB 617. The research team will consider the role of transportation infrastructure, emissions, and related authorities, policies, and practices as communities moved from pre-selection to design, approval, and implementation of monitoring and emissions reduction plans. The team will engage in semi-structured interviews and focus groups, content analysis and archival and interview data, legal analysis, and geospatial analysis of regulatory and community-deployed monitoring and inventory data.

Evaluating the Travel Behavior Impacts of Los Angeles Metro’s K-14 Fareless Initiative

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

October 1, 2022 - June 30, 2024

Principal Investigator

Areas of Expertise

Public Transit, Shared Mobility, & Active Transportation Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

In October 2021, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation, or LA Metro (the largest transit agency in Los Angeles County), launched the GoPass Fareless pilot program in collaboration with other regional transit operators and multiple school districts across the county. The program offers free transit passes to K-14 students. Students attending eligible schools may enroll in the program by receiving a card from their school and registering it online. Participation in the program is decided by school districts, who opt in by paying a cost-sharing fee of $3 per student per year. While other student fareless programs have been attempted and some others remain in service—including the DASH to Class program which offers free rides on the City of Los Angeles’s DASH service and has been active since 2019—the scale of LA Metro’s program provides a unique opportunity to assess the ability of a large-scale program to change travel behavior among participating students. This project will 1) analyze the differences in student enrollment in the GoPass fareless program among eligible schools based on socio-economic characteristics and access to existing transit services; 2) assess how the program has impacted ridership at Metro-operated bus stops near schools in the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours; and 3) identify individual characteristics that influence students’ trip generation and mode choices for school and other trips. The project will survey Los Angeles United School District (LAUSD) high school students about their current school, work, extracurricular travel activities, and availability of household mobility devices compared to their travel behavior before joining the program.

Understanding the “New Normal:” Activity and Mobility Patterns of Low-Income and Disadvantaged Communities in the Era of Hybrid Work and High Gas Prices

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Basar Ozbilen

Areas of Expertise

Safety, Public Health, & Mobility Justice Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Davis

Project Summary

Starting in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has had significant and long-lasting effects on the organization of work activities and travel as many workers have adopted hybrid work schedules. Essential workers and members of lower-income communities have been less able to adapt to flexible work schedules and have experienced more impacts from the pandemic. More recently, supply chain disruptions, rising costs of living in U.S. cities, and international tensions that have led to sharp changes in gas prices have put further pressure on members of low-income and disadvantaged communities, who often already have lower mobility and economic power.

This study will expand on and complement an existing large behavioral study carried out at UC Davis on evolving activity patterns and travel choices during these times of disruption, focusing on in-depth interviews of members of low-income and disadvantaged communities. Due to the difficulty in reaching members of these communities and the limited information that can be captured on their specific circumstances from larger quantitative surveys and other data collection methods, the researchers will identify participants from previous related research to be resampled for a round of semi-structured interviews to be carried out in either English or Spanish, discussing changes in their private and work activities, availability of travel modes, and changes in living costs and gas prices, among other topics. The information gathered from these interviews together with survey data will help provide important insights on the way households in these communities are adjusting to the current disruptions and help inform planning processes and shape policy recommendations to fill equity gaps and improve mobility for all.

Exploring Mobility Types and Car Dependency in the Los Angeles Region

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

December 1, 2022 - November 30, 2023

Principal Investigator

Areas of Expertise

Safety, Public Health, & Mobility Justice Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Davis

Project Summary

Los Angeles (LA) is one of the most car-dependent regions worldwide. It has a sprawled urban form, a well-connected highway system, and a limited set of reliable alternatives to car travel. Considering the threats of Climate Change and the availability of emerging mobility technologies such as ride-hailing (also known as Transportation Network Companies, or TNCs), shared micromobility (e.g., bike-sharing, e-scooters), electric vehicles, and vehicle automation, the way people travel as well as the role of cars are likely to change in the future. As a result, there is a strong need to better understand mobility types and factors affecting car dependence in LA to set a baseline for a more sustainable future for transportation system. It is particularly important to explore how travel is organized and which role the car plays for different groups in LA because the region has a diverse representation of households with various socio-economic and demographic backgrounds, which creates significant variability in terms of transportation availability. As the world enters the post-pandemic era, this study can serve as one of the pioneer efforts to explore how the transportation landscape will evolve after COVID-19. Given these considerations, this research project aims to assess mobility types and car dependence in the region and draw from these to develop policy implications that will help reshape the transportation system in LA. The research team will design and administer a cross-sectional survey and analyze the data collected in multiple neighborhoods in the LA region. The online survey will be administered in winter 2023. This unique dataset will allow the in-depth analysis of respondents’ travel preferences, attitudes towards the use of cars and other travel modes, perceptions regarding the built environment and transportation infrastructure, and psychological factors that affect activity-travel behaviors. With this knowledge, the research team will be able to identify and differentiate subjective and objective dimensions of car dependence and define distinctive mobility types in the region. Researchers will develop weights to address any potential issues related to the lack of representativeness in the sample and to ensure the findings can mirror LA residents’ travel behavior and mobility preferences. This study will allow the research team to understand mobility patterns and travelers’ characteristics in the LA region and help guide policymakers in developing strategies that can address the variations in individuals’ mobility needs based on socio-spatial differences in the future.

Connecting Telework, Travel Behavior, and System Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Status

In Progress

Project Timeline

November 16, 2022 - June 30, 2024

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Areas of Expertise

Infrastructure Delivery, Operations, & Resilience Travel Behavior, Land Use, & the Built Environment

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic and the imposed social distancing measures led many workers to adopt telecommuting—working from home—arrangements on a large scale. The massive changes in work activity may have long-term impacts on domestic and travel behavior, including how people organize their work, where that work is performed, how activities and travel are scheduled, and what travel mode is used. Telework has been touted as a potentially effective travel demand management strategy as well as an environmental management tool for reducing travel and greenhouse gas emissions under Senate Bill 375. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated travel restrictions, despite creating immense disruption to our lives, also offered an opportunity to experience how telework policies and practices can affect daily travel, should it remain a significant part of the work landscape.

This study considers how telecommuters have responded to the changes in activity-travel scheduling and time allocation. In particular, it considers how workers utilized time during the pandemic by comparing workers who telecommuted with workers who continued to commute. Commuters were segmented into those who worked in telecommutable jobs (potential telecommuters) and those who did not (commuters). Findings from this work suggest that telecommuters exhibited distinct activity participation and time use patterns from the commuter groups. This study also supports the basic hypothesis that telecommuters were more engaged with in-home versus out-of-home activity compared to potential telecommuters and commuters. In terms of activity time-use, telecommuters spent less time on work activity but more time on caring for household members, household chores, eating, socializing and recreation activities than their counterparts. During weekdays, a majority of telecommuters did not travel and in general this group made fewer trips per day compared to the other two groups. Compared to telecommuters, potential telecommuters made more trips on both weekdays and weekends while non-telecommutable workers made more trips only on weekdays. The findings of this study provide initial insights on time-use and the associated activity-travel behavior of both telecommuter and commuter groups during the pandemic.