Where Ridehail Drivers Go Between Trips: Trading off Congestion and Curb Availability?

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

September 1, 2019 - May 1, 2021

Principal Investigator

Project Summary

Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) have the potential to improve mobility and reduce parking demand. However, recent research has highlighted the additional vehicle travel and congestion generated by TNCs. The behavior of TNC drivers when out of service (i.e. between paid trips) has received little attention. Out-of-service TNC trips, however, generate vehicle travel through repositioning and cruising when in motion, and occupy curb and parking spaces. While cruising for parking and cruising by taxis have been extensively researched, there is little data to assess the extent of cruising by TNCs. This project will provide one of the first analyses of the impacts of out-of-service TNC trips on vehicle miles traveled and congestion. Investigators will use the City of San Francisco as a case study; focusing on how drivers’ choices affect congestion, vehicle miles traveled, and curb space availability. The project will apportion out-of-service TNC travel in San Francisco into these three categories, using a sample of millions of GPS traces of out-of-service TNCs. Many GPS traces will encompass more than one of these categories, but the working assumption is that each trace can be divided into segments that are characteristic of a single behavior. For example, a driver might reposition and then cruise. The second part of the project examines the factors that predict driver behavior. For example, how does the driver choice between repositioning, cruising and parking vary by driver hours worked, times of day, neighborhood demographics, urban form, and curb space regulation?

How Dock-less Electric Bike Share Influences Travel Behavior, Attitudes, Health, and Equity: Phase II

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2019 - September 30, 2020

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Project Summary

The recent emergence of dock-less electric bike (e-bike) and scooter (e-scooter) shares have a growing number of California cities exploring the use of bike/scooter share systems to improve environmental, social, and health outcomes of the transportation system. Increasing bike/scooter share usage is likely to improve users’ physical activity and reduce their vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and related greenhouse emissions. However, these benefits fall under the assumption that users is replacing a car trip with a bike / scooter trip. If the major mode shift comes from public transit, owned bike, or walking, then the expected benefits of bike / scooter share may be more limited. Many existing studies of bike share systems focus on system dynamics, but less is known about how bike/scooter share influences individual level travel behavior, including substituting for car travel. Considering VMT reduction is a statewide goal for meeting greenhouse gas emissions targets, understanding how bike/scooter share can reduce car travel is important. Additionally, understanding how planning and regulation of bike/scooter share systems influences car substitution rates can help cities craft local plans and regulations to maximize VMT reductions from their bike/scooter shares. One of the largest dock-less e-bike shares in the United States opened last summer across Sacramento, West Sacramento, and Davis. The current study of users of this system and nearby residents focuses on measuring the effect of the e-bike (and now e-scooter) share on other travel modes (specifically car travel), attitudes, and public health, along with measuring the equity of the system. This project continues the current project with the addition of further survey data collection and summary of individual level behavior, attitudes, and health. The researchers will add two strategic goals to the second year of the project. First, researchers will build statistical models from the survey data to predict existing system-wide travel mode shift to better estimate system-wide vehicle miles reduced by the system. Second, they propose to model JUMP demand and examine regulation/ planning scenarios (e.g. service area boundaries and vehicle caps).

The​ ​Opportunity​ ​Cost​ ​of​ ​Parking Requirements:​ The Case of Silicon Valley

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

July 1, 2018 - September 30, 2019

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Project Summary

A growing consensus among economists and economic geographers suggests that America’s most constrained housing markets, and in particular the constrained housing markets on California’s coast, impose high costs not just on people in those markets but on the nation as a whole, by inhibiting migration and placing a drag on productivity. Strict zoning regulations prevent people from moving to areas where they would be most productive, imposing costs that are quiet and atomized but that collectively are large. Despite gaining increasing attention in the last ten years, parking requirements remain relatively overlooked in the literature on land use restrictions. Existing attempts to quantify land use restrictiveness do not measure the stringency of minimum parking requirements, even though parking requirements are often the binding constraint on dense development. The research team proposes examining the relationship between minimum parking requirements, urban land markets, and travel behavior, using Silicon Valley as a case study. The team will specifically examine how minimum parking requirements:
Shape the locations and characteristics of new development,
Distort the location of firms and weaken agglomeration economies, and
Make driving less expensive.
The research team will conclude the assessing the political possibility for parking reform in Silicon Valley.

Social Impacts of Transit Oriented Development on Disadvantaged Communities

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Michelle E. Zuniga

Project Summary

Planners need tools to better understand the social and community impacts of transit-oriented development (TOD) so they can proactively address barriers and challenges to equitable sustainable development for low-income and disadvantaged communities. Although TOD can help achieve regional greenhouse gas (GHG) emission goals and spur local revitalization, in some cases it results in gentrification and residential displacement of long-term residents. Fear of negative TOD impacts on housing affordability, neighborhood identify, and social cohesion have driven many community groups to forcefully oppose near-station developments and planners need new approaches for integrating community perspectives into the TOD planning process.

This study surveyed residents regarding their perceptions (negative and positive) of neighborhood change and associated development along an existing commuter rail corridor and planned route of the new OC Streetcar in the City of Santa Ana, a largely low-income, Latinx community in central Orange County, California. A total of 329 surveys were collected between August and October 2019. Findings from this study include that on average residents are satisfied with neighborhood access to transport and amenities, and that higher neighborhood satisfaction was associated with a more positive assessment of development and neighborhood change. Residents living near the streetcar route had more negative assessments of change, reflecting heightened concerns about housing costs, displacement, and parking.

Improving the Distribution of Densities in Southern California

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Irvine

Project Summary

Many of the biggest transportation challenges in Southern California arise from the lack of concentration of densities. However, little is known about how to address this critical problem and its adverse consequences. While recent years have witnessed increasing efforts to expand public transit services and encourage compact development in transit areas, there is a dearth of research providing detailed guidance for improving the distribution of densities in the region. Furthermore, existing studies have tended to focus on the City of Los Angeles, resulting in lost opportunities for understanding what challenges exist in the rest of the region, particularly in (suburban) places with great potential for density concentrations. This project will examine the complexity of urban densification dynamics with a focus on thirty selected cities in Southern California where public transit services will be widely available and thus land use intensification will be highly desired in the future. Specifically, the project will (i) conduct an exploratory analysis to identify ways in which urban densification takes place through zoning and actual land use changes that should be jointly addressed in coordination with transportation planning; (ii) develop a model to better understand how zoning has changed (in relation to the expansion of public transit services), to what extent zoning changes have led to shifts in actual land use patterns, and how changes in land use induce further zoning modifications in nearby areas; and (iii) identify hotspots that deserve attention for more strategic densification in the region.

Mobility of Older Adults in California: In the Era of Shared Mobility

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Suman Mitra

Project Summary

The older adult (65 and over) population in the United States is quickly growing in proportion, and it is expected to reach its highest point by 2030 when the baby boomers will have all passed age 65. In California, the elderly population is expected to grow more than twice as fast as the total population, and this growth will vary by region. Mobility is a critical element of one’s quality of life regardless of one’s age. Good mobility and decent transportation alternatives are important in enabling the older population to participate in daily activities and remain socially active. This study will examine the transportation mobility of older adults in California by analyzing data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, with an emphasis on those living in rural and disadvantaged areas. Individuals aging in rural and disadvantaged communities are disproportionately affected by poverty and other challenges that accompany poor economic circumstances, and in turn, may face greater challenges than their peers aging in large urban locations. Specific objectives of this research are to estimate the impact of age, and other demographic and geographic characteristics on various measures of mobility, including ability to drive, use of shared mobility services, use of public transportation, trip frequency for both discretionary and nondiscretionary travel, unmet travel demand, barriers to using public transportation, and satisfaction with available transportation options.

How the Built Environment Affects Car Ownership and Travel: Evidence from San Francisco Housing Lotteries

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

September 1, 2018 - May 1, 2020

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Santa Cruz

Project Summary

Residential location is arguably one of the most important aspects of a person’s lifestyle and relates to everything from individuals’ self-identities to their employment opportunities and transportation choices. From a policy perspective, matching the provision of residential options to the preferences of society is one of the most crucial roles of urban planning and infrastructure design. However, a major challenge for understanding how locational amenities, such as public transportation, affect residents’ behavior is that people choose where to live, and do so based in part on a neighborhood’s amenities. This research project overcomes challenges surrounding self-selection to provide credible causal inference about how residential location affects transportation and economic outcomes. The research leverages the lottery that allocates households in San Francisco to below-market rate (BMR) housing units, which effectively serves as a randomized experiment that removes self-selection. Given the scarcity of affordable housing, BMR lotteries can attract 60+ applicants per unit, and so, by design, lottery winners are randomly assigned to residences. Using administrative data, this project affirms that lottery-winning households’ baseline preferences are uncorrelated with their allotted residential features such as public transportation accessibility, parking availability, and bicycle infrastructure—meaning that neighborhood attributes and a building’s parking supply are effectively assigned at random. Successful lottery applicants were surveyed about their transportation choices and employment. Survey results demonstrate that neighborhood attributes (i.e., parking, transit access, and walkability) significantly affect transportation mode choices. Most notably, the amount of on-site parking greatly changes households’ car ownership decisions and driving frequency, with substitution away from public transit. In contrast, parking supply does not affect employment or job mobility. Overall, the evidence from this study robustly supports that local features of the built environment are important determinants of transportation behavior.

How Well Do New K-12 Public School Sites in California Incorporate Mitigation Measures Known to Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled?

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

July 1, 2018 - August 31, 2020

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Karen Frick, Sandra Mukasa, Jamie Albrecht

Campus(es)

UC Berkeley

Project Summary

A public school’s location has sizable impacts on transportation patterns and vehicle miles travelled (VMT). While California has made major policy strides to reduce VMT and greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation and support safe walking/biking (e.g., AB 32, SB 32, SB 375, AB 1358, AB 734, and SB 1), public school facility planning and siting are largely unconnected from these efforts. Despite the 2015 draft Governor’s Environmental Goals and Policy Report stating, “As the State prioritizes efficient, infill development, K-12 schools will be integrated into planning,” no reforms have yet been implemented. As California implements bold policies to reduce VMT—and at the same time the state and local school districts invest billions of dollars in public school facility infrastructure each year—it is imperative to align these efforts so state and local infrastructure dollars are working on shared purposes. This project aims to inform California state agencies on state policy reforms to link VMT and school siting outcomes as well as develop guidance and tools for local governments on joint planning.

The Impacts of Upzoning on Housing Production and Communities in California

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

July 1, 2018 - June 15, 2019

Principal Investigator

Project Team

Carol Galante, Elizabeth Kneebone, Karen Chapple, Jared Nolan, Simon Hochberg, David Garcia, Anna Cash

Campus(es)

UC Berkeley

Project Summary

Since the passage of Senate Bill 375, the State of California has mandated the coordination of land use and transportation planning in an effort to promote infill development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, housing production continues to fall far short of need, with the state struggling to concentrate new housing developments near transit lines. In addition, neighborhoods located near transit tend to be lower-income, raising concerns about displacement and the potential impacts of new development on housing affordability. This project will analyze the characteristics of neighborhoods surrounding transit station areas (both rail and bus) in the State of California. Using data on the demographic characteristics of affected communities, the real estate characteristics of local properties, and local housing ordinances, the research team will estimate how much development is feasible and at what price point, how many affordable units might be produced via local requirements, and how many renter households may be vulnerable to displacement. This research project is unique in that it will consider the potential for real estate development (i.e., production) in tandem with the concerns of residents (i.e., protection and preservation)—too often, work in this area focuses only on one perspective or the other. The research team will also hold two workshops, one in Southern California and the other in Northern California, with stakeholders representing different sides of the debate. The workshops will be designed to solicit feedback on the analysis, and to generate a discussion about policy approaches that can balance production and protection concerns.

Answers from the Margins: Participatory Planning with Disadvantaged Communities

Status

Complete

Project Timeline

October 1, 2018 - December 15, 2019

Principal Investigator

Campus(es)

UC Davis

Project Summary

Public engagement in transportation planning processes can sometimes be hard to conduct in a meaningful way, particularly when engaging with disadvantaged communities. The reasons for this are numerous: meeting times conflict with work or caretaking responsibilities, lack of advertisement, weak connection with local community, difficulties in transportation, lack of resources within planning agency, and other logistical and resource related challenges. Additional barriers to equitable transportation may include the structure of planning processes, as well as the historical structural inequalities in the distribution of transportation resources.This project will assess current practices for engaging disadvantaged communities in participatory planning processes for transportation projects in California. The goal will be to identify specific practices, projects, or processes that were particularly successful in engaging disadvantaged communities. Materials from transportation projects and agencies will be collected and analyzed in regard to the planning processes, the level of engagement achieved, and the resulting outcomes. Interviews will be conducted with transportation professionals who took part in these processes. The project will begin by connecting with professionals with a stated investment in disadvantaged communities through their participation in active conversations on transportation equity and mobility justice. Organizations such as Untokening Collective, a multiracial collective that centers the lived experiences of marginalized communities to address mobility justice, will participate in the analysis. Patterns and themes in the participatory planning processes will be analyzed, as will their efficacy through both qualitative and quantitative measures. A final report will share patterns and themes that highlight promising trends in engaging in meaningful participatory planning with disadvantaged communities.